FieryDog twitter
FieryDog Rss

Obama admits he is afraid of terrorists

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Global News, Obama | Posted on 04-05-2011

0

The news broke a few minutes ago. President Obama, the most unpresidential POTUS since Grant, has decided not to release the death photos of Osama bin Laden. Mr. Obama is afraid it might anger the Muslims.

Who cares what the animals think?

Do these animals stop and ask themselves, “If I cut off this person’s head on live television, will it anger Americans?” If they do, as soon as they realize it will, they swap the blade in hand for something a bit duller, rustier!

Some will argue, “But we should consider all the other Muslims. We don’t want them angry.” Why not? Were they angry when Osama and his band of demonic Koran-carrying-devil-worshippers flew a couple of planes into the World Trade Center? Were they outraged enough to take up arms after Daniel Pearl had his head lopped off? Of course not. So, why are we worried they might be offended by a picture of a current resident of Hell with a hole in his head?

Why help the enemy?

Yes, photos can be touched up to make anything appear the way you want it to. But why allow the evil jihadis to claim this is nothing more than a propaganda ploy? Without a body, there is no assurance Osama bin Laden is dead. Those who fear him will continue to fear him and those who adore him will continue to follow him until they know for certain he is dead.

Why does President Obama insist on mollycoddling our enemies?

It seems Mr. Obama has never met a dictator he didn’t like. And it seems anyone who considers Israel an enemy is a friend of Obama. Yes, the enemies of Mr. Obama’s enemies (Israel, England, the US) are his friends. If we are going to prosecute this war like we are a judge in a mild divorce case, we might as well give up now. We’ve already lost this war. Our government is scared to death of the jihadis. Our government is scared to death of Muslims. Maybe because they realize American citizens won’t kill them, but these Koranic devils have no qualms about chopping off Obama’s or Biden’s head. It would even make prime time on Al Jazeera!

Wasn’t killing UBL a sign of strength?

I have no doubt people will claim Obama and his minions aren’t afraid of the Muslims. They’ll point to the murder of UBL as a sign of strength. But this is errant thinking. First, let me give a big Hurah! for the soldier that got Osama bin Laden. However, we shouldn’t let Obama trick us into believing this was a “capture” mission. As Obama spokesman Jay Carney said yesterday, bin Laden was unarmed. He attemped to resist and had to be shot in the head.

Let’s face it, if that happened in the US, there would be rioting. Look at the Rodney King incident. They didn’t even kill him! But more than that, bin Laden’s death is the best thing for Obama’s flailing re-election campaign.

If Obama captured UBL, he would have to detain him somewhere. If BO put UBL in NYC, New York would probably turn red faster than a preacher with an open zipper! And if BO put UBL in Gitmo, he would lose the looney left he loves so much.

Dems Preparing for 2012 Loss?

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Democrats, elections, MSM, Obama, Republicans | Posted on 26-04-2011

0

I’m already hearing people claim Mr. Obama is a shoe-in for the 2012 election. They are saying he is unbeatable. With the elections so far away, why start this kind of talk?

The propaganda machine of the Third Reich knew the best way to convince people of your “truth,” is to say it loud and say it often. It doesn’t matter what the facts say. As Joseph Goebbels said, “Propaganda should be popular, not intellectually pleasing. It is not the task of propaganda to discover intellectual truths.” The only thing that matters is that people believe Obama can’t be beat.

Why do people need to believe this? For starters, it is meant to discourage wishy-washy voters who would otherwise vote against Obama. Some will say, “What’s the use in voting? They’ve been telling us for two years now the man can’t lose.”

But there is another reason. It allows democrats to challenge a loss. After all, the experts have predicted a landslide victory for Obama. How could XYZ have won unless he cheated?

Another great thing about this tactic of the democrats is that it allows them to continue with other lies. When Obama loses re-election, democrats and neo-socialists will claim the people did not vote against their socialist programs. They will claim the people overwhelmingly voted for wealth redistribution, collectivization, socialist programs, and entitlements, but the republicans cheated… and who paid the price? The People!

Mark my words… you will hear all of this when Obama loses in 2012.

- 30 -

On sale now for $1.99 The United States Constitution: A Common Conservative’s Perspective

Betrayed again!

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Conservative Corner, Democrats, Economy, Obama, Republicans, RINOs | Posted on 09-04-2011

0

This has to be some of the most ridiculous rhetoric I’ve seen come from our government in decades. I can’t think of the last time I’ve heard such garbage.


Both sides have played the American people once again. It’s as if we’re supposed to say, “Ooh! Thank God our saviors in Congress reached a last second deal.” And we’re all supposed to fall at their feet, worshiping these nad-less, worthless people because they compromised and once more brought of from the brink of destruction! Just like Barack Hussein Obama did by virtue of his election.


Do they really think they are fooling anyone? Out of almost $4 TRILLION, they managed to save our nation by whacking $38.5 billion? And hell would have come to earth if they saved another $1.5 billion? Let’s just think about this for a second . . . $38.5 billion is roughly 1 per cent of the budget Obama submitted.


Do these people really expect us to believe $.99 out of every dollar they spend is spent well?


This all began because a gaggle of cowardly politicians did not want to risk losing seats in the last election. Democrats could have (and should have) passed this budget last year. The gutless Republicans have enabled them.


I hear next week Congress will order the mass murder of 120 million Americans. The talking points of both parties will be… “Hey, we spared you, right? You should be thanking us.”


At that point, Jim Moron…er…Moran, the Democrat from Virginia, will give a speech entitled, “Shut up and sit down or we’ll bury you too.”


Want to learn about the Constitution?

Comrade Obama Strikes Again

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Obama, Sexual Politics | Posted on 23-02-2011

0

Was Comrade Obama really a constitutional law professor? Perhaps that was simply spin. The truth is probably something more like “Mr. Obama wiped his butt with a copy of the constitution AND he stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night.”

According to Courthouse News Service:

 On Wednesday, Attorney General Eric Holder wrote a letter to Congress stating that President Barack Obama has found that the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, violates the right to equal protection afforded under the Fifth Amendment. Passed in 1996, DOMA prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages.

 The president cannot determine a law is unconstitutional. If anybody is to do that, it is the judiciary under the practice known as judicial review. As the Chief Executive, Barack Obama’s job is to execute–that is, carry out–the laws the Congress passes. Whether he likes them or not, he must abide by them and enforce them! There is no such thing as a retroactive veto.

Now, none of this matters when you have a dictator for president. Kim Jong Il, Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, and now Barack Obama–they are all democratically elected presidents who have the power to act as the head of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Now it’s just a matter of time before he begins the purges.

Iran video

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Global News, Obama, video | Posted on 14-02-2011

0

Iranian government chasing people down with motorcycles and using cattle prods on the demonstrators. Where is President Obama? Why hasn’t he strongly urged the Iranian government to refrain from civil rights violations? Why isn’t Obama asking for the government to step down and embrace democracy?

At least Hillary Clinton has shown support of the Iranian people. I wonder how long it will be before BamBam clubs her over the head and says “America should not stick its nose into other countries’ business.”

Where’s Waldo Obama?

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Global News, Obama | Posted on 14-02-2011

0

 President Mahmoud I’maDoucheBag…er… Ahmadinejad has arrested opposition leaders in Iran according to NY Daily News. So the question remains, where’s President Obama? Like that children’s book hero, Waldo, President Obama continues to be silent on the subject of Iranian freedom.

Am I the only person in the world who believes Mr. Obama loves every dictator who hopes to harm America and Israel? Or can it be that President I-bow-to-the-Saudi-King Obama just loves anything that might bring about a muslim regime?

Are you ready for the revolution?

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Conservative Corner, Obama | Posted on 08-08-2010

0

There’s a revolution brewing. It’ll happen in just a few months. But I admit, I have some trepidation.

History often has a way of repeating itself. In 1994, Bill Clinton was in the crapper. It looked like the people were ready to dump him as soon as possible. But then it happened–the republican revolution.

Lead by Newt Gingrich, Republicans controlled Congress and got things done. What’s so bad about that, you ask? Well, Bill Clinton received credit for the booming economy (he wisely kept his hands off); he received credit for creating a surplus (with the republican plan); and he was re-elected. According to modern mythology, Bill Clinton is one of the greatest presidents of the 20th Century–possibly even of all time.

Now, if history repeats itself, a Republican–or more so, a Conservative–revolution might actually forge a place in history for our socialist president as “Dear Leader,” the greatest leader since Mohammed. If that happens, we might see another six years of his socialist agendas and his anti-Israeli, muslim-loving. And if the people aren’t fed up with him, they might continue repeating history and elect someone even further to the left.

Obama warrantless wire tapping

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Democrats, Obama | Posted on 14-02-2010

0

Remember all the left wing media hype about Bush and warrantless wire tapping? Where is the outrage now?

Cnet reported Friday, “…the Obama administration has argued that warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no “reasonable expectation of privacy” in their–or at least their cell phones’–whereabouts.”

Check out the full article here.

Sound the Alarm!

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Democrats, health care, Obama | Posted on 23-10-2009

0

Why do democrats insist on repeating lies?

Almost every day, I hear some moronic Congressman (or woman) saying we need a public option to foster “competition.”

So, let’s see. When consumers needed competition for local and long distance phone service, did the government create a phone company? No, they broke up Ma Bell (in 1987) and then had the Telecommunications Act of 1996, demanding the incumbents help their competitors enter the marketplace. (Mind, you, I think that was unconstitutional, but I’ll stick to the point). Competition was created by other corporations.

Now that all television signals must be digital, consumers are forced to pay for television–at an ever-increasing expense. In most areas, there is only one provider.  What has the government done to force competition? Nothing. Congress certainly hasn’t created a government-run cable company.

Where’s the competition in computers? Windows or Mac, that’s it? Sure, there’s *nix, but where’s the Obamanite Operating System? And why are the people limited to AMD or Intel processors? Shouldn’t we have a government subsidized Congressional-Chip?

Perhaps some will argue we do not need television, the internet, or phones. Of course, that flies in the face of the democrats who argue these are basic human rights and the federal government should subsidize them for the less fortunate.

We need food as well. When I was younger, I could get Big Mac for less than $1. Now, they’re over $2. I used to buy a can of Coca-Cola for $.25 and now the same store sells them for over $1. Surely, I have to eat and drink. And these stores should not be allowed to profit from my hunger. So, where are the government wine & cheese shops selling me my food at discount rates to create competition for the profiteering, greedy corner stores and gas stations?

While I’m on basic needs–why is there only one power company, gas company and water company in my town? The government should create additional corporations to sell me these things cheaper…just to keep the other companies honest. Heck, the government should own all businesses and set the wages and prices for everything, guaranteeing that no one make a profit off of someone else’s need or desire. Yes, that’s sarcasm. but it’s also the road we’re heading down.

Obama, Pelosi, Frank, Reid, Snowe, and the other lying scumbags in Washington have no interest in keeping insurance companies “honest.” That’s a bit like expecting the fox to keep his word when he says he’ll watch the hen house for you while you’re on vacation. And these devils have no desire to foster competition. If they did, they would have started in some of the other areas I mentioned.

It has and always will be about CONTROL.

When they government is footing the bill, they can say, “Since we’re covering your health care, we own your body and control what can or cannot go into it.”

  • You can’t smoke
  • You’re overweight…go to this fat camp or go to prison
  • No, you don’t need greasy fries…they are now illegal
  • Cheeseburgers? You’ll go out like Elvis. That’s why we must shut down all fast food
  • You already have a child, we’ll have to kill this one to save the environment. After all, this child will be a CO2 factory and consume natural resources
  • You WILL take this flu shot because we own you and the others you might make sick
  • We noticed you voted for the opposition last election. Now, this is not political, but we can’t have mentally ill people like you running around, so–no–we’re not going to allow the heart transplant. But seriously, there are no politics involved. 

Perhaps I am an alarmist. You might be right. Then again, if there were more alarmists alive in China, Russia, and Cambodia when these same signs started cropping up, maybe a hundred-million-plus people wouldn’t have died in the hen house while the fox guarded it.

Al Qaeda isn’t a threat

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Conservative Corner, Obama | Posted on 22-10-2009

0

When I was young, the Russians were our enemy. The Iranians also despised us, but it was the Russians we feared most. We worried bout their plans for global domination. Then Ronald Reagan came along and changed everything. He undid the anti-patriotic, suicidal anti-Americanism Jimmy Carter fostered. Reagan encouraged Americans to love their country once more. He helped free East Germany, Poland, and millions of others in the Soviet Bloc.

Now, in some respects, I wish he hadn’t. It was easier when our enemies were without. It was easier when we could point to a place on a map and say, “Here. These people want to destroy our way of life.” When we placed that finger to the page, it was on the other side of th world. Yes, we fought communism in Central America and saw it rise in Africa, but they were always somewhere else.

Today when we point to the place on the map where our enemies exist, we might mention Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran, but like the days before, these were our secondary and tertiary enemies. Currently, our number one enemy–the enemy trying to fundamentally alter our way of life and enslave us under a socialist-marxist dictatorship–is not around the globe. The finger falls on Washington DC.

The enemies of Liberty are no longer without. They are within our borders. They sit in the White House and behind the desks of the House and Senate. With the Soviets, we lived under a threat of nuclear war, but had MAD (mutually assured destruction) to prevent either side from trying to conquer the other. Today, we don’t have that luxury. There is no MAD where Congress, the TOTUS, and the POTUS are concerned. As President Obama gathers an enemy list and as Congress passes legislation to destroy capitalism and Liberty, we have little power to effect them.

Mr. Obama and his left wing cronies like to talk about classism, class warfare, and a divide between rich and poor, but the true divide is only the political class verses the civilian class. The former manipulates the latter, causing internal wars and battles, so the political class can accumulate more power and more wealth by stealing it from the rightful owners–We, the People.

The world doesn’t need Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Al Qaeda or the Soviets to destroy the United States. We have the American government doing a bang up job of it already.

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.