Like usual, they are grossly underestimating the cost and exaggerating the income from their tax hike. To get the money they want they would have to dramatically increase the tax rate on those making $200k and more.

By now most people probably know President Obama lied yesterday during his speech when he said he met Boston teacher Robert Baroz. Obama held Mr. Baroz up as an example as to why Congress needed to pass his Jobs Bill. In so doing, he intimated that Mr. Baroz was out of work and the Jobs Bill would get Mr. Baroz back in the classroom. Of course, the two men never met. Mr. Baroz did sit in the front row during a press conference in the Rose Garden. (He may even have spent the night in a Holiday Inn Express). Furthermore, Mr. Baroz is not out of work.

Now, that’s not where the hypocrisy comes in. Instead, consider this snippet taken from the Boston Herald:

Baroz, who supports Obama and his efforts to restore the public sector, told the Herald yesterday he doesn’t mind if the president — or his speechwriters — took some liberties with the facts. It was all in aid of a higher truth, he said.

A higher truth? So, lying is acceptable if it is done while trying to get something you want? Does that mean those who claim GW lied need to apologize to him? If he lied, it was simply to get his higher truth realized, right?

Wait, should we be surprised? These are the same people who have lied consistently for decades. Consider:

•  SNL’s Sarah Palin skit: “I can see Russia from my house.” They knew she didn’t say it, yet they pretended she did and then perpetuated that lie. (I can appreciate the humor in it. It was the perpetuation of the story that made it a lie).
• Lies about the 2000 election and Florida–ie Bush stole it and Jeb helped him.
• Constant creative (deceitful) interpretations of the Constitution–ie football players can’t pray voluntarily before a game.
• Made up facts in order to prove global warming.

I guess I’m not surprised after all.

Mission Accomplished Left Wing Libbies!

Probably one of the most honest and telling moments about how liberals misuse government power to shut down those they hate comes from the city councilwoman, Susan Guidry, who promises they will look at everything they can in zoning laws to force him to take down the signs.

Anyway, once more, our socialist leader has commented that everyone needs to pay their “fair share” including the rich and corporations. Okay, I am not opposed to one paying their fair share. Heck, if Dear Leader wants to have people pay their “Fair Share,” shouldn’t he be abolishing the progressive tax system and replace it with one which taxes everyone equally?

But that is beside the point. Here is my question: How much is someone’s fair share? Why does no one ever ask our Marxist-in-Chief: “Precisely how much money does the federal government deserve from a family making $250,000 or more?” Or better yet, “What percentage do you think a person deserves to keep after all the various taxes applied by federal, state, and local governments?”

Perhaps if everyone starts jamming his websites, phones, faxes, etc. with demands that he answers that question, we might actually get an answer intead of ridiculous platitudes from the boy who would be dictator.

# # #

Have you read the U.S. Constitution lately? If you want to read it and learn the how’s and why’s behind many aspects, check out:  The United States Constitution: A Common Conservative’s Perspective

Without doubt, I believe the debt ceiling should not have been lifted. However, now that the vote has been tallied, Tea Party members and Conservative GOPers need to begin filling the sand bags and building the levees. The neosocialists will definitely spin this to their advantage. If the eceonomy turns in time for the 2012 election, Obama and his marxist buddies will proclaim Keynesian economics finally worked even though the evil Conservatives tried everything to foil our Dear Leader’s altruistic and benevolent plans for mankind. And if the economy stays in the toilet–as it probably will–Democrats and Obama zombies in the media will capitalize on it, claiming Obama never had a chance. He needed to raise the debt ceiling to continue with his brilliantly targeted spending and Keynesian projects, but the wicked, greedy Republicans choked the life out of any recovery we might have had by voting against increasing our debt.

- 30 -

Kindle Version ow on sale

The United States Constitution: A Common Conservative's Perspective

Who wouldn’t want to see something like this?