FieryDog twitter
FieryDog Rss

Government Motors & Our Marxist President

Posted by Brutus | Posted in Obama | Posted on 30-04-2009


According to the Communist Manifesto

The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organised as the ruling class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible.

Is this not what has happened? The uber left elected a Marxist president who has successfully taken capital from the investors and given it to the State and the workers. According to the WSJ

Yet Secretary Timothy Geithner and his auto task force, led by Steven Rattner, have somehow decided that Treasury and UAW chief Ron Gettelfinger will get to own a combined 90% of GM. If there’s a reason other than the political symbiosis among the Obama Administration, Michigan Democrats and the auto union, it’s hard to discern.

The article further states that private investors will receive less than $.05 on the dollar for their investments while the government takes a 50% stake in the company. Contrary to the lie Obama told last night about not wanting to meddle in the auto industry, his removal of one CEO demonstrates his dictatorial governance of those who refuse to follow his socialist/Marxist agenda. The Manifesto goes on to say

Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.

As we see with the proposed nickel on the dollar plan, Obama and this administration are following the despotic suggestions of Marx to deny people their right to property in order to revolutionize the mode of production.

Marx went on to say

When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character.

So, as Marx predicted, the nationalization of industries is a way of stripping political power from the People and placing it in the hands of the government and unions.

Here is my question: at what point do we snap?

We can have all the little tea parties we want, but that will not stop Obama from trampling the Constitution and radically changing the government with the help of a despotic Congress. Obama has already dismissed and mocked the people protesting him, demonstrating his disdain for the Right of the People to assemble and redress grievances.

The only lawful things I can see is a mass descending on D.C. We need a ten or twenty-million person march. In as much as we can, we must refuse to buy or use anything owned by the government or unions. If that doesn’t work, then we need state legislatures and governors who will live up to the responsibilities instilled in them by our Framers. We need State governments who will nullify these unconstitutional laws until we can vote out all the socialists and Marxists in office.

Write a comment

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.